Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
Iran
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
20172020
Benefit adequacy in poorest quintile by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT))
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (9,424.03) among 12 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 9,424.03 | +66874.5% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 279.93 | +482.6% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 105.7 | – |
| 1 | Djibouti (2012) | 59.82 | – |
| 1 | Viet Nam (2020) | 55.63 | +7.8% |
| 1 | Thailand (2021) | 46.65 | +7.1% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q1_preT_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_preT_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q2_preT_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q3_preT_tot)