Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Haiti
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
20012012
Benefit adequacy in poorest quintile by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (9,379.37) among 11 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 9,379.37 | +78444.0% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 358.73 | +1030.3% |
| 1 | Djibouti (2012) | 347.2 | – |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 137.32 | – |
| 1 | Iran, Islamic Rep. (2020) | 66.38 | +162.0% |
| 1 | China (2013) | 52.26 | – |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q5_rur)