Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Tonga
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
20092009
Benefit adequacy in poorest quintile by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (12,283.75) among 11 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 12,283.75 | +63858.8% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 442.45 | +1458.9% |
| 1 | Iran, Islamic Rep. (2020) | 90.34 | +453.6% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 86.79 | – |
| 1 | Romania (2021) | 45.74 | +21.8% |
| 1 | Nepal (2010) | 42.91 | – |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q1_urb)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_urb)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q2_urb)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q3_urb)