Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Tonga
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
20092009
Adequacy of transfers to 2nd quintile, rural by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (6,839.32) among 11 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 6,839.32 | +68349.4% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 325.82 | +380.2% |
| 1 | Djibouti (2012) | 83.79 | – |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 71.96 | – |
| 1 | Viet Nam (2020) | 54.26 | +140.7% |
| 1 | Belize (2009) | 45.92 | – |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q3_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q1_rur)