Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Kiribati
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
20062006
Adequacy of transfers to richest quintile, rural by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (6,202.58) among 11 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 6,202.58 | +110339.9% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 150.79 | +216.0% |
| 1 | Kyrgyz Republic (2020) | 55.45 | -38.2% |
| 1 | Nepal (2010) | 45.33 | – |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 41.13 | – |
| 1 | Romania (2021) | 39.53 | -6.4% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q5_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q5_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q5_urb)