Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
Zimbabwe
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
20172019
Benefit adequacy for poorest by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT))
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (32,924.01) among 13 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 32,924.01 | +75529.4% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 555.94 | +318.5% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 119.57 | – |
| 1 | Armenia (2022) | 103.62 | -7.8% |
| 1 | Viet Nam (2020) | 103.55 | +36.8% |
| 1 | Thailand (2021) | 91.05 | +63.6% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q1_preT_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_preT_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q2_preT_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q3_preT_tot)