Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Togo
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
20112021
Benefit adequacy for poorest urban by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (44,786.43) among 12 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 44,786.43 | +78030.8% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 499.22 | +320.8% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 163.45 | – |
| 1 | Armenia (2022) | 104.64 | -10.9% |
| 1 | Kyrgyz Republic (2020) | 85.44 | -2.6% |
| 1 | Thailand (2021) | 82.24 | +42.6% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q1_urb)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_urb)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q2_urb)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q3_urb)