Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
Togo
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
20112021
Benefit adequacy for 2nd group rural by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (23,033.81) among 13 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 23,033.81 | +81941.2% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 465.05 | +163.8% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 205.7 | – |
| 1 | Armenia (2022) | 99.39 | -25.8% |
| 1 | Kyrgyz Republic (2020) | 84.6 | -14.4% |
| 1 | Thailand (2021) | 62.66 | -13.0% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q3_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q1_rur)