Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
Poland
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
20052017
Subsidies benefit adequacy for second quintile by country in 2011 (adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural)
In 2011, India had the highest value (24.47) among 3 countries, while Tajikistan had the lowest (0.57).
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | India | 24.47 | – |
| 1 | Kyrgyz Republic (2020) | 19.26 | +83.5% |
| 1 | Poland (2017) | 10.8 | +28.4% |
| 1 | Chile (2022) | 3.8 | +286.5% |
| 1 | Fiji (2013) | 3.42 | – |
| 2 | Mongolia (2020) | 8.21 | – |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.adq_q3_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.adq_q4_rur)
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.adq_pop_rur)