Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
Poland
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
20052017
Rural benefits to second quintile from subsidies by country in 2017 (benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural)
In 2017, Poland had the highest value (26.11) among 3 countries, while Russian Federation had the lowest (8.52).
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 26.11 | +30.0% |
| 1 | Chile (2022) | 24.39 | +29.1% |
| 1 | China (2013) | 23.77 | – |
| 1 | Tajikistan (2011) | 20.37 | – |
| 1 | Ukraine (2020) | 19.18 | +25.1% |
| 2 | Fiji (2013) | 20.8 | – |
Similar Datasets
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.bry_q2_rur)
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.ben_q1_rur)
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.ben_q3_rur)
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Subsidies -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_fw.ben_q4_rur)