Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Other Social Assistance -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Other Social Assistance -rural
Poland
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Other Social Assistance -rural
20052019
Adequacy of benefits for second poorest in rural areas by country in 2008 (adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Other Social Assistance -rural)
In 2008, Ecuador had the highest value (66.26) among 3 countries, while Lithuania had the lowest (5.53).
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ecuador | 66.26 | – |
| 1 | Marshall Islands (2019) | 46.15 | – |
| 1 | Honduras (2009) | 38.12 | – |
| 1 | Lesotho (2017) | 30.1 | – |
| 1 | Romania (2016) | 29.24 | +65.9% |
| 1 | South Africa (2014) | 19.62 | +129.3% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_allsa.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Other Social Assistance -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_os.adq_q3_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Other Social Assistance -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_sa_os.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Other Social Insurance -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_si_ss.adq_q2_rur)