Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Uzbekistan
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
20182018
Adequacy of private transfers for rural second quintile by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (7,653.3) among 12 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 7,653.3 | +66130.2% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 429.71 | +193.4% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 94.83 | – |
| 1 | Viet Nam (2020) | 86.22 | +497.0% |
| 1 | Djibouti (2012) | 83.79 | – |
| 1 | Armenia (2022) | 63.44 | -35.5% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q3_rur)