Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Uzbekistan
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
20182018
Adequacy of private transfers for rural poorest by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (11,437.83) among 12 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 11,437.83 | +79695.8% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 465.61 | +470.5% |
| 1 | Djibouti (2012) | 347.2 | – |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 141.21 | – |
| 1 | Armenia (2022) | 86.8 | -1.1% |
| 1 | Kyrgyz Republic (2020) | 69.48 | -15.0% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q3_rur)