Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
Uzbekistan
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
20182018
Benefit adequacy for poorest rural by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -rural)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (47,959.17) among 13 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 47,959.17 | +87454.7% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 526.89 | +357.3% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 123.49 | – |
| 1 | Fiji (2013) | 108.24 | – |
| 1 | Armenia (2022) | 107.79 | -7.4% |
| 1 | Kyrgyz Republic (2020) | 102.5 | -17.3% |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q2_rur)
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -rural
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q3_rur)