Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Last updated time
Source name
Filters
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Tonga
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
20092009
Benefit adequacy in poorest quintile by country in 2019 (adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers)
In 2019, Poland had the highest value (9,988.66) among 12 countries.
| # | Country | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poland | 9,988.66 | +62017.6% |
| 1 | Lao PDR (2018) | 314.5 | +884.1% |
| 1 | Mauritania (2014) | 105.7 | – |
| 1 | Iran, Islamic Rep. (2020) | 78.27 | +305.1% |
| 1 | Djibouti (2012) | 61.56 | – |
| 1 | China (2013) | 47.59 | – |
Similar Datasets
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_ip.adq_q1_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_allpr.adq_q1_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q2_tot)
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (per_pr_dp.adq_q1_urb)